Sunday, November 1, 2009


This is my first attempt at making simple comics. These comics will not be heavy on story for now because of the fact that i am still learning the art of it all. I have already made some major discoveries from simply attempting this, and I am going to go through each panel and talk a little about what may or may not have went wrong, and what went pretty good for a first time inking.

Alright, so in panel one we have the title of the cartoon, Robo. The first mistake that I made with this is the fact that the three lines under the last O don't follow the same fashion as the rest of the word, they don't have the same 3D feel as the rest for i forgot to give them depth. The Robots placement in this frame worked really well and yes, his head does float, but its a cartoon so I have that kind of freedom. The problem with him is that i tried to give him too much detail, well I gave pretty much everything too much detail, but I will talk about this later. As for the clouds, I will just address those now. So what I was originally going for was some realistic clouds, but my comic in general is not meant to look entirely realistic, so there was mistake number one for the clouds. Mistake number two is that I still need to learn to do better shadowing if I wanted to even achieve realistic clouds. Lastly, I attempted to draw them to quickly, Clouds are delicate and so I must take more care into their construction. One final not on this panel is that with the words none of them followed an identical feel of simplicity. That is pretty much the same for all the scenes with clouds in them.

Panel 2. Now i rather like panel 2 because it is a very close up shot of the little robot fellow and so you should see more detail, I did again go overboard with this but at least I am learning for my mistakes. The button teeth came out pretty well, I don't know if i would go with a complete shade with the edges of each button again. Now for the small portions of the eyes that you can see I purposefully went with two different looks, one completely filled in, all but the reflections, and one a little less dramatic. I think the less dramatic one went better, I need to better learn white space conservation, as I need to better learn a ton of things (literally). There is one line in the face detail that doesn't follow the others, simply a mistake of going to fast again.

Panel 3 the clouds actually are not that bad on the left side of the robot, the right side is a little dark, but these are the closest to what I was trying to do with the clouds, I don't think I would do them again like this either way. Now the details upon Robo's face are much to bold, and I take any responsibility for any sore eyes they may have caused. The lines around Robo are supposed to be sun-rays, but they flopped and so i would try something different next time, maybe pencil a few ideas out first. Speaking of penciling, I left a lot of it in because i could not find my good eraser. The left eye looks more appealing than the right in this frame, this is not a coincidence.

Panel 4 has some solid ideas that just didnt come out how I had planned, but will only improve as i get better. FIRST OFF, TURN CAPS LOCK OFF. Check. Now as for the clouds, just ignore them, but behind the clouds, that is a water tower. I did not attempt to look at any images of water towers because that would have only made sense, so this is drawn from memory, sorta. What the watch tower does give me is the possibility for a location in which to set my comic, as opposed to this field of clouds. The claw. Well the claw had its ups and downs, the ups would be the serial number on the wrist, I can go into some backstory into his creation, so its a nice bit of info. The downs though are the fact that the claw itself is much too rounded, i wanted to go for a good number of sharp angles in Robo on everything but his flexible arms. They claws also don't appear to be able to work even if they were real, the joint is much out of place. The wind sweeps in the sky are kind of nice and give a bit of movement in a rather still first page, but they are still a bit too sloppy.

Panel 5 reveals to the reader that Robo has no legs, revealing a bit more of the character than if i had just done a fully body shot, it would have revealed to much in too short of time. The problem with this shot is that i drew the right side of his body wrong, i drew it too flat, giving him the appearance of being a cardboard box, which he is not. Also the shadow that corresponds in the grass doesn't fit to how i drew the body. The grass overall was drawn rather well, the only thing it does is make the clouds appear to be bushes but thats not the grasses fault. I tried to go easy on the body detail for this shot which worked out a little better, but the reflections of light i did draw shouldn't be there is relation the the shadow. I still don;t know if i want to be concerned with shadow placement in general. Maybe a little here and there, but not to much, I mean it is supposed to be cartoony still. The bit of claw you do see is the only reason I will ever need for not free-handing with a permanent writing material, unless i'm doing it on purpose of course. You can still see part of the original sketch that i completely neglected.

Panel 6 is bit confusing, the clouds you see are supposed to be dust being kicked up by the wind, but the wind that I drew is drawn in a different direction, so my bad. The expression on Robo's face is exactly what i was going for. It's actually kind of funny because I use a gameboy to kind of determine how to draw to placement of Robo from whatever angle i was going for at the time. I cannot decide whether the body detail is where I should be headed for more, or if it sucks entirely. The lines for robo are a bit sloppy, I should definitely attempt to straighten all of my lines.

Panel six sucks.

And in panel 7, I was going for an extreme closeup of one of the eyes. I tried to show a closed aperture but also show it was behind glass, lets just say I should stick with more simple things for now. Also the metal detail could have been refined.

Overall I made a truck load of mistakes that I can hopefully learn from, if you have any tips or pointers, I am more than happy to hear them.

Thanks for reading.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Fear of writing

For some time I have had this fear of people reading my writing because I have had terrible ups and downs when it comes to my writing and this has led me to believe that I am rubbish at the whole thing. So I am opening up right now to any critique, I know i need it to ever improve, so here is the midterm i just wrote. I know its going to be bad but it needs to be done.

Midterm

Is there a modernist artist whose work you particularly admire? Please explain why, and discuss at least one work in your answer.

A modernist artist I truly admire would have to be Magritte. I firstly, enjoy the simplicity of his work, such as his treason of images. A pipe with the saying, this is not a pipe. Magritte didn’t go for the shock factor as other surrealists may have. “And if his art had confined itself to the administration of shock, it would have been as short-lived as any other surrealist ephemera.” His paintings, though simple and gorgeous, seemed to take the higher intellectual road. The phrase, “this is not a pipe” makes the viewer reassess their thought process on what it is that they are viewing, thus coming quickly or not to the fact that it is a painting and indeed not a pipe. His other works of art, display his rather dark childhood from when he found his dead mother. The motherly figure is a prominent role in his line of work as is death, both seem to result from this early experience. These influence not only personalize the art for himself but they give me great inspiration to use the influences in my own life to reflect my own work.


How did artists attempt to represent motion? Please describe one specific work in your answer.

Artists tried to show movement in few ways, such as by blurring the moving parts of a subject or showing the many ways in which something can move but on a single canvas. The best example for this is Giacomo Balla’s Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash. In this painting Balla tries to capture all the different frames of movement of a dog being walked into one single painting instead of many. The effect is like that of many translucent photos laid on top of one another of the same subject in motion. It’s something seen with your eyes every moment of every day but captured in a way that one may not have thought until then.


Architecture

In Europe, architects developed the “International Style” with the goal of creating an architecture for the middle class. In your essay, describe this style and then tell whether or not you think the International style has had a positive influence on the architecture of our times. Give specific reasons for your judgments.


The architects that developed the international style did so with the middle class in mind. Minimal yet strong housing for the masses. They had utopia in mind, an equal perfect world, and their architecture greatly reflected these ideals. The international style was groundbreaking in its use of light materials that could build better buildings than ever before. The thought that a building’s internal skeleton held the weight of the structure and not the walls was revolutionary at best. Le Corbusier’s work demonstrates this principle of the style, more so in his Villa Savoye. The villa seems to stand on nearly toothpicks compared to the rest of the structure. the walls are white, and made out of a light stucco material. Think about the homes of today, light in weight, lacking any major artistry on the facade. All characteristics of the international style. One of the characteristics mentioned about the homes of today is the lack of decoration. The international style wanted to get rid of the unnecessary aspect of decoration. Decoration seemed to not meet with the architects view of utopia. They wanted places that were simple, functional and sleek. The Suburban boom that occurred after world war II in America was just that. It’s affordability and usability was a prime target for the new american family after the war. A world after war, a utopia of sorts. These early suburbs have evolved into the suburbs we clearly see today in our american society. The same thing for miles and miles. This is the problem with the style, it becomes annoyingly repetitive. The houses around Murrieta are nearly identical no matter which housing contract you go to. All the houses constructed from wood and stucco, all of them, it’s enough to make someone go mad. The Influence the international style has had on the architecture of our day has in my opinion, been mostly negative. Sure it gave way to better built buildings, but at the cost of originality. The suburbs are just a sign of uninspired laziness at this point. When every house looks like the next it feels that the architects only had to design a few buildings to get it all done. To know that the house I live in is not special because there are 20 others like it is disheartening at best. The uniformity of everything kills a lot of the creativity of individual housing, that each house could have been an individual work of art, is inspiring to the individual. That the style of the individual architect could have been seen or noticed from the rest no longer exists. I couldn’t tell you who designed any of the houses around here, or if they were even done by multiple people. This is how the international style has negatively influenced the architecture of today. As great as a utopia may sound, it simply cannot happen without losing something. Though it was wonderful in its development, its crippling of creativity is enough to need to throw it out all together.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Sorry to anyone who follows

I have been what seems to be the worst blogger ever, this will be changing shortly with new improvements such as actually posting!

I hope i the blog-o-sphere isn't completely dead.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

I know i am a dead friend now...

Yeah i suck at maintaining this thing but oh well.

I got the from padfoot and i will use the same method he did.

X means I've read it.
X+ means I read it and loved it.
X- means I read it and hated it.
* means I plan on reading it.

1. [ ] Pride and Prejudice Jane Austen
1.5 [*] Pride and Prejudice AND ZOMBIES!
2. [*] The Lord of the Rings JRR Tolkien
3. [] Jane Eyre Charlotte Bronte
4. [Almost finished the series] Harry Potter series JK Rowling
5. [X+] To Kill a Mockingbird Harper Lee
6. [X+] The Bible
7. [ ] Wuthering Heights Emily Bronte
8. [*] Nineteen Eighty Four George Orwell
9. [ ] His Dark Materials Philip Pullman
10. [ ] Great Expectations Charles Dickens
11. [ ] Little Women Louisa M Alcott
12. [ ] Tess of the D’Urbervilles Thomas Hardy
13. [*] Catch 22 Joseph Heller
14. [X-] Complete Works of Shakespeare (I've read enough{Agreed})
15. [ ] Rebecca Daphne Du Maurie
16. [*] The Hobbit JRR Tolkien
17. [ ] Birdsong Sebastian Faulks
18. [*] Catcher in the Rye JD Salinger
19. [ ] The Time Traveller’s Wife Audrey Niffenegger
20. [ ] Middlemarch George Eliot
21. [ ] Gone With The Wind Margaret Mitchell
22. [*] The Great Gatsby F Scott Fitzgerald
23. [ ] Bleak House Charles Dickens
24. [ ] War and Peace Leo Tolstoy
25. [*] The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy Douglas Adams
26. [ ] Brideshead Revisited Evelyn Waugh
27. [] Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoyevsky
28. [*] Grapes of Wrath John Steinbeck
29. [*] Alice in Wonderland Lewis Carroll
30. [*] The Wind in the Willows Kenneth Grahame
31. [ ] Anna Karenina Leo Tolstoy
32. [ ] David Copperfield Charles Dickens
33. [In Progress] Chronicles of Narnia CS Lewis
34. [ ] Emma Jane Austen
35. [ ] Persuasion Jane Austen
36. [*] The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe CS Lewis
37. [ ] The Kite Runner Khaled Hosseini
38. [ ] Captain Corelli’s Mandolin Louis De Bernieres
39. [ ] Memoirs of a Geisha Arthur Golden
40. [ ] Winnie the Pooh AA Milne
41. [X+] Animal Farm George Orwell
42. [*] The Da Vinci Code Dan Brown
43. [*] One Hundred Years of Solitude Gabriel Garcia Marquez
44. [ ] A Prayer for Owen Meaney John Irving
45. [ ] The Woman in White Wilkie Collins
46. [ ] Anne of Green Gables LM Montgomery
47. [ ] Far From The Madding Crowd Thomas Hardy
48. [ ] The Handmaid’s Tale Margaret Atwood
49. [X+] Lord of the Flies William Golding
50. [ ] Atonement Ian McEwan
51. [Currently reading] Life of Pi Yann Martel (so far this has been an awesome read)
52. [ ] Dune Frank Herbert
53. [ ] Cold Comfort Farm Stella Gibbons
54. [ ] Sense and Sensibility Jane Austen
55. [ ] A Suitable Boy Vikram Seth
56. [ ] The Shadow of the Wind Carlos Ruiz Zafon
57. [*] A Tale Of Two Cities Charles Dickens
58. [ ] Brave New World Aldous Huxley
59. [ ] The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time Mark Haddon
60. [ ] Love In The Time Of Cholera Gabriel Garcia Marquez
61. [X+] Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck
62. [] Lolita Vladimir Nabokov
63. [ ] The Secret History Donna Tartt
64. [ ] The Lovely Bones Alice Sebold
65. [*] Count of Monte Cristo Alexandre Dumas
66. [ ] On The Road Jack Kerouac
67. [ ] Jude the Obscure Thomas Hardy
68. [ ] Bridget Jones’s Diary Helen Fielding
69. [ ] Midnight’s Children Salman Rushdie
70. [*] Moby Dick Herman Melville
71. [ ] Oliver Twist Charles Dickens
72. [*] Dracula Bram Stoker
73. [ ] The Secret Garden Frances Hodgson Burnett
74. [ ] Notes From A Small Island Bill Bryson
75. [ ] Ulysses James Joyce
76. [ ] The Bell Jar Sylvia Plath
77. [ ] Swallows and Amazons Arthur Ransome
78. [ ] Germinal Emile Zola
79. [ ] Vanity Fair William Makepeace Thackeray
80. [ ] Possession AS Byatt
81. [ ] A Christmas Carol Charles Dickens
82. [ ] Cloud Atlas David Mitchell
83. [ ] The Color Purple Alice Walker
84. [ ] The Remains of the Day Kazuo Ishiguro
85. [ ] Madame Bovary Gustave Flaubert
86. [ ] A Fine Balance Rohinton Mistry
87. [X] Charlotte’s Web EB White
88. [ ] The Five People You Meet In Heaven Mitch Alborn
89. [*] Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
90. [ ] The Faraway Tree Collection Enid Blyton
91. [*] Heart of Darkness Joseph Conrad
92. [ ] The Little Prince Antoine De Saint-Exupery
93. [ ] The Wasp Factory Iain Banks
94. [ ] Watership Down Richard Adams
95. [ ] A Confederacy of Dunces John Kennedy Toole
96. [ ] A Town Like Alice Nevil Shute
97. [ ] The Three Musketeers Alexandre Dumas
98. [X] Hamlet William Shakespeare
99. [X] Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
100. [*] Les Miserables Victor Hugo

And according to the BBC, I have read 3 more than the average. I really am planning on reading all of the ones I have marked, and yes paddy, i will be finishing the harry potter series.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Sorry, its been a while

Every time I get on a computer I mean to update my blog, but I am always distracted by something else like adobe illustrator or fail blog, but here I am today.

I don't really know what to say but the biggest change in my life right now is that I am no longer single and i am stoked.

I wish I had more time to talk but I have something I need to get done. I just thought I would let you know.

Thursday, January 1, 2009

New years!

WAS BAMF!

I am having the time of my life, so many late nights and so much left for dead.

this is more so that i don't go on paddy's dead friends list.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Finals

My last final is in a few minutes and i'm not the slightest bit worried.
It's my government final which happens to be my longest final(thats not saying much considering my other two finals were either 47 questions or a 3 minute biblical poem presentation), its 100 questions which is lame only cause i know its going to take someone the full ammount of time to do, making so i can't talk. but luckily I brought Traveling Mercies with me by Anne Lamott so that should be rather entertaining.

I am stoked for christmas next week and my only stress right now is that i finish all my christmas gifts for my friends and family.

Thanks for reading.